View 2 excerpts, cites methods and background. Catastrophic dynamics limit Atlantic cod recovery. Regime shifts, resilience and recovery of a cod stock. In the North and Baltic seas Atlantic cod Gadus morhua stocks collapsed as part or one of the major factors inducing large-scale ecosystem regime shifts.
Determining the relative contribu- tion of … Expand. Analysis of coastal cod Gadus morhua L. Was an increase in natural mortality responsible for the collapse off northern cod. What can be learned from the collapse of a renewable resource? Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, of Newfoundland and Labrador. View 20 excerpts, references background and results. Small marine pelagic fish and the threat of fishing; are they endangered? Environmental influences on fish and shellfish production in the Northwest Atlantic.
View 1 excerpt, references background. Recruitment predictions for Atlantic cod Gadus morhua in the North Atlantic, based upon a previously published regression with salinity, are found to be well correlated with recent recruitment … Expand. View 5 excerpts, references results. View 2 excerpts, references background. Development of management measures for the groundfish fishery in Atlantic Canada.
Abstract Subsequent to extension of fishery jurisdiction in it was Canadian policy to favour the inshore sector in rehabilitation of the Canadian groundfish fishery. Catch allocation, limited … Expand. The disappearance of refuge areas led to the decline of any buffer biomass that could help the rebuilding of stocks. Buffer mass is the required amount of fish necessary to rebuild stocks to previously high levels, so if this decreases then the stocks may not be able to recover.
How did this happen? The controversial answer. The cause of the collapse was a highly debated and controversial subject. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans placed blame on forces beyond their control, including cold water temperature and predation by seals.
According to Brubaker [ 3 ], both Department of Fisheries and Oceans scientists and independent scientists published numerous papers documenting the role of overfishing in the collapse, sighting environmental factors as only minor roles, however the Department of Fisheries and Oceans barely mentioned overfishing in its overview of the causes stock collapses.
Myers, J. Hutchings and N. Barrowman, highly respected fisheries scientists, describe the primary factor of the collapse of cod stocks in their controversial paper Why do Fish Stocks Collapse? An Example of Cod in Atlantic Canada. Myers et al. They conclude:. A large overcapacity in the fishing fleet allowed the potential for very high fishing mortality. The decline in the populations and the high fishing mortality were not recognized because of statistical bias and over-reliance on commercial catch-per-unit-effort data that were not proportional to the true abundance.
This conclusion hastily put an end to the debate. The blame was correctly laid on overfishing due to inadequate policy. Establishment of private property rights through individual transferable quotas. According to Homans et al. In practice, the most recurrent property rights-based solutions involve individual transferable quotas, whereby fishermen hold a right to a share of biologically determined Total Allowable Catches [ 9 ]. According to Anderson and Leal, well defined property rights are the heart of free market environmentalism.
They state that. Fishery owners realize that if they harvest unsustainable catches and destroy their resource they will bear the costs and consequences of their actions. According to Brubaker, exclusive, permanent property rights let fishery owners benefit from their conservation effort, creating incentives to correctly monitor and conserve their stocks and habitats [ 3 ].
According to Leal [ 10 ], individual transferable quotas increase conservation because initiatives to sustain the health of a fishery can pay off immediately by increasing the value of the quota. Individual transferable quotas allow fishery owners to base their decisions on their own detailed knowledge of local stocks, fish behaviours and environmental conditions.
Brubaker states that this kind of knowledge is important because it is specific to their time and place, allowing them to chose and implement actions quickly [ 3 ]. According to Leal, individual fishing quotas have proven effective to reduce overcapacity, which is often produced with increased legislation [ 10 ].
Since legislation often placed time restrictions on the fishing season, overcapacity became a problem due to the incentives this type of legislation created, such as the biggest, fastest boats to catch the most fish in the allotted time and fishing during unsafe conditions. With individual transferable quotas the season can remain open for much longer, allowing fishers to fish when and where they choose, thus reducing incentive to invest in unnecessarily large and fast boats.
Leal reports that safety can improve as a result of individual fishing quotas as fishers will no longer have incentive to fish in bad weather [ 10 ].
Leal states that because the individual transferable quotas are transferable, quota holders can adjust the size of their operation by buying and selling the right to their quota [ 10 ]. Evalutation of individual transferable quotas: will they work? There is an increasing number of programs where individual transferable quotas have been implemented successfully, producing a number of positive results including reducing overfishing.
The earliest examples of successful implementation of this strategy took place in Iceland and New Zealand in the early s [ 9 ]. Even though Atlantic Canada landed and processed only 82 per cent as many fish and produced a lower quality product, there were 10 times as many Canadian fishermen, 17 times more boats and twice the plant workers.
Private fisheries around the world including but not limited to salmon fisheries in Iceland, inland fisheries in England, oyster beds in the United States and quota based fisheries in New Zealand verify that property rights promote sustainable fishing behavior. Clearly, fishermen have more incentive to conserve and monitor their stocks and invest in their habitat with a privately owned fishery.
Leal reports that the introduction of individual transferable quotas has had significant positive effects on the halibut fishery in Alaska, including reaching the primary goal of creating a sustainable fishery [ 10 ]. Leal notes that, since the implementation of the individual transferable quotas, managers were able to extend the season from one day openings to eight month long operations [ 10 ].
The longer season has increased the availability of fresh fish and increased the price per pound. It has also increased safety due to reduced incentive to fish in bad weather. According to Leal, the Total Allowable Catches are no longer routinely exceeded, less gear is lost, and less fish is destroyed on the trip [ 10 ]. Leal also reports that the new system has also increased species conservation; as an example, investments that were used for overcapacity are now used for selective harvesting [ 10 ].
This example illustrates a number of positive effects individual transferable quotas can have on a fishery, including the primary objective of creating a sustainable fishery by reducing overfishing.
Both of these examples show that the establishment of private property rights through individual transferable quotas have been successfully implemented in the past with excellent results; therefore individual transferable quotas are a viable solution for reducing overfishing and preventing stock collapses.
A sustainable future in fisheries: what is the best solution? Furthermore, there is broad agreement that fisheries should evolve towards lower fishing effort, higher stock abundance, less impact on marine ecosystems and higher economic profitability [ 8 ].
However, there is less agreement on how to get to this desired state from where fisheries are today. Different disciplines point to different solutions, and there are differences within these disciplines [ 8 ].
It is obvious that a drastic reduction of overcapacity will have to occur if fisheries are to acquire sustainability [ 12 ]. In response to growing awareness of the failures of fisheries management, there have been widespread attempts to improve its performance, most notably by greater emphasis on assessing the uncertainty in stock assessments and management systems as well as considering these in decision making, including the involvement of fishers and other interest groups in the management process [ 4 ].
According to Hilborn, understanding the behaviour of fishermen is a key ingredient to successful fisheries management [ 8 ]. It has also been suggested that fisheries policy makers should fully consult fishermen in the development of fisheries rules and regulations, and give them a say in the implication of those rules [ 7 , 5 ]. The Federal government appeared to regulate the fisheries in every way possible, but nothing seemed to prevent the over-exploitation of this important resource [ 10 ].
According to Leal government regulations have placed restrictions on the size and power of fishing vessels, the types of fishing gear, the times and area in which fishing is allowed, the number of trips a single vessel can make in a season, the amount of fish vessels can land per trip, and the size of fish allowed to be removed from the sea [ 10 ]. This is consistent with the discarding hypothesis. We suggest that age-specific abundance trends estimated from research surveys and VPA should be compared for all stocks where such data exist, and that high priority should, be given to the measurement of discarding levels and the extent to which catch misreporting is related to changes in fishing mortality.
Collections Hutchings, Jeffrey A. Search DalSpace. This Collection. Login Register. View Usage Statistics.
0コメント